The right of juries to decide questions of law was widely accepted in
the colonies, especially in criminal cases. Prior to 1850, the judge and
jury were viewed as partners in many jurisdictions. The jury could
decide questions of both law and fact, and the judge helped guide the
decision-making process by comments on the witnesses and the evidence.
Legal theory and political philosophy emphasized the importance of the
Jury in divining natural law, which was thought to be a better source
for decision than the "authority of black letter maxim." Since natural
law was accessible to lay people, it was held to be the duty of each
juror to determine for himself whether a particular rule of law embodied
the principles of the higher natural law. Indeed, it was argued that
the United States Constitution embodied a codification of natural rights
so that "the reliance by the jury on a higher law was usually viewed as
a constitutional judgment."
--Kane & Miller Friedenthal
Source: Civil Procedure, p 476-77, chapter 11, Jury Trial; 2 The Judge Jury Relationship (West Publishing Company 1985).
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home